Security Czar

Security Czar
Scott Granneman, 2006-03-23

In this column Scott Granneman takes the role of dictator of the security world and presents his ideas about mandatory reforms that would improve security for millions of people.

Expand all | Post comment

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Erik N

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)

Here here!!! 2006-03-24
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Here here!!! 2006-11-08
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Stonewall

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Wremes (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Mr. Negative (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-26
Anonymous

Let's go for it! 2006-03-23
assurbanipal (2 replies)

Re: Let's go for it! - Why? 2006-03-24
Anonymous

Re: Let's go for it! 2006-04-14
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Nekromancer (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-30
EasterNerd (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Mick

Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
Todd Knarr (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-04-14
The Finger

Security Czar 2006-03-24
Anonymous

Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-24
Doug Sibley (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-29
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-04-01
Doug Sibley (1 replies)

Re: Re: Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2007-06-21
Anonymous

Security Czar - more reading of history needed 2006-03-24
Craig S Wright (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar - more reading of history needed 2006-04-14
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-24
Craig S Wright

No mandatory training 2006-03-27
Michael Scovetta (3 replies)

Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-29
Anonymous

Bad analogies but to an extent I agree. For your typical task-oriented worker (CSR, teller, etc), the computer should be locked down and centrally managed to the point of requiring virtually no training. However, knowledge workers, power users, home users, etc., can't be constrained with highly locked down systems and need basic training.

Some people should have training before having kids.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/394/33396#33396

Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-29
Anonymous

Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-30
Anonymous

Yes! (except for one thing...) 2006-03-28
Penguinisto

Security Czar 2006-03-29
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-30
Lunkwill

Security Czar 2006-03-31
Paul Stepowski

Security Czar 2006-03-31
FortHEX

Security Czar 2006-04-02
Anil B