Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Security Czar
Scott Granneman, 2006-03-23

In this column Scott Granneman takes the role of dictator of the security world and presents his ideas about mandatory reforms that would improve security for millions of people.

Comments Mode:
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Erik N
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Here here!!! 2006-03-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Here here!!! 2006-11-08
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Stonewall
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Wremes (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Mr. Negative (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar 2006-03-26
Anonymous
Let's go for it! 2006-03-23
assurbanipal (2 replies)
Re: Let's go for it! - Why? 2006-03-24
Anonymous
Re: Let's go for it! 2006-04-14
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Nekromancer (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar 2006-03-30
EasterNerd (1 replies)
Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Mick
Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md
Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar 2006-04-14
The Finger
Security Czar 2006-03-24
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-24
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-24
Anonymous
Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-24
Doug Sibley (1 replies)
Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
The idea of self-governance does not work when it comes to business (Enron, Worldcom..etc). Decision based on benefits vs. cost marginal analysis alone is a parochial view of economic much less reality. Like it or not, the business world needs some form of governance when it comes to security. Business is about making tradeoff for economic gain and as an entity, it has no ethics or social conscience.

Balance between costs/benefits for the business and the big picture must also be achieved (an online site offering to sell credit card info is a business in the purest sense).

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/394/33398#33398
Security Czar 2006-03-24
Craig S Wright
No mandatory training 2006-03-27
Michael Scovetta (3 replies)
Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-29
Anonymous
Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-29
Anonymous
Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-30
Anonymous
Yes! (except for one thing...) 2006-03-28
Penguinisto
Security Czar 2006-03-29
Anonymous
Security Czar 2006-03-30
Lunkwill
Security Czar 2006-03-31
Paul Stepowski
Security Czar 2006-03-31
FortHEX
Security Czar 2006-04-02
Anil B







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus