Security Czar

Security Czar
Scott Granneman, 2006-03-23

In this column Scott Granneman takes the role of dictator of the security world and presents his ideas about mandatory reforms that would improve security for millions of people.

Expand all | Post comment

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Erik N

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)

Here here!!! 2006-03-24
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Here here!!! 2006-11-08
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Stonewall

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Wremes (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Mr. Negative (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-26
Anonymous

Let's go for it! 2006-03-23
assurbanipal (2 replies)

Re: Let's go for it! - Why? 2006-03-24
Anonymous

Re: Let's go for it! 2006-04-14
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Nekromancer (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-30
EasterNerd (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-31
Mick

Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
Todd Knarr (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar 2006-03-23
infamous41md

Security Czar 2006-03-23
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar 2006-04-14
The Finger

Security Czar 2006-03-24
Anonymous

Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-24
Doug Sibley (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-03-29
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2006-04-01
Doug Sibley (1 replies)

Re: Re: Re: Security Czar -- A.K.A. Mr. Tin Pot Economic Regulator 2007-06-21
Anonymous

Security Czar - more reading of history needed 2006-03-24
Craig S Wright (1 replies)

Re: Security Czar - more reading of history needed 2006-04-14
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-24
Craig S Wright

No mandatory training 2006-03-27
Michael Scovetta (3 replies)

Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-29
Anonymous

Re: No mandatory training 2006-03-30
Anonymous

For the record, there is a simple reason why MS chose not to bundle antivirus protection in with upcoming Windows Vista..if they did, they would get sued for exercising monopoly power. They have no choice but to make it a separate product.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/394/33409#33409

Yes! (except for one thing...) 2006-03-28
Penguinisto

Security Czar 2006-03-29
Anonymous

Security Czar 2006-03-30
Lunkwill

Security Czar 2006-03-31
Paul Stepowski

Security Czar 2006-03-31
FortHEX

Security Czar 2006-04-02
Anil B