, 2006-07-05
A recent lawsuit filed against Microsoft should have all companies reexamining their privacy policies to determine what information they are actually collecting about customers, and what they can possibly do with it.
Expand all |
Post comment
Windows genuine disadvantage
2006-07-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage
2006-07-06
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Why aren't my customers adversely affected?
2006-07-07
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Re: Why aren't my customers adversely affected?
2006-07-07
Kelly Martin (3 replies)
Kelly Martin (3 replies)
Spyware vs. EULA
2006-07-10
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Where's the virus defenition for WGA in Norton Antivirus? Where's the entry for WGA in Symantec's virus library?
2006-07-12
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Re: Where's the virus defenition for WGA in Norton Antivirus? Where's the entry for WGA in Symantec's virus library?
2006-07-14
GrimRebuke (1 replies)
GrimRebuke (1 replies)
So Symantec's software phones home too? Pot, Kettle, Black, Rasch?
2006-07-17
Gordon Fecyk (1 replies)
Gordon Fecyk (1 replies)
Re: Why aren't my customers adversely affected?
2006-07-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

But your response is especially disingenuous in your use of the word "theft". You seem to be purposefully misunderstanding the point about different copyright violations. And a breach of contract is not theft, whether you like it or not. It may be no less wrong, but using correct terms and definitions is important to having a proper discussion, rather than the emotionally laden words the BSA, MPAA, and RIAA have grown so fond of using. And you seem to have not only swallowed the kool-aid (tm) here, but have even asked for more.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/409/33778#33778