Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Windows Genuine Disadvantage
Mark Rasch, 2006-07-05

A recent lawsuit filed against Microsoft should have all companies reexamining their privacy policies to determine what information they are actually collecting about customers, and what they can possibly do with it.

Comments Mode:
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Chris (5 replies)
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Mark D. Rasch
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Rob (1 replies)
Copyright Infringement vs. Theft 2006-07-06
Mark D. Rasch
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-12
Anonymous
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-17
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-07
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Re: Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Why aren't my customers adversely affected? 2006-07-07
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Re: Why aren't my customers adversely affected? 2006-07-07
Kelly Martin (3 replies)
Show me the data! 2006-07-08
Gordon Fecyk
Spyware vs. EULA 2006-07-10
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Where's the virus defenition for WGA in Norton Antivirus? Where's the entry for WGA in Symantec's virus library? 2006-07-12
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
Re: Where's the virus defenition for WGA in Norton Antivirus? Where's the entry for WGA in Symantec's virus library? 2006-07-14
GrimRebuke (1 replies)
So Symantec's software phones home too? Pot, Kettle, Black, Rasch? 2006-07-17
Gordon Fecyk (1 replies)
> Symantec would be foolish to toss a hat into this ring, when so many systems are running their software, which phones home constantly.

OK, before I fall off my desk laughing hysterically at this irony, I should point out that there is actually a recorded instance of Norton Antivirus "phoning home":

http://www.computergripes.com/NortonAntiVirus2003.html

OK, now pardon me a second...

[/me falls off desk laughing... picks himself up]

> What a brilliant argument, except that showing proof would require a breach of contract because one would have to reverse-engineer just what the program is doing.

Yeah... I love irony, you know!

But... but... but... isn't a "spyware EULA" unenforceable like Rasch says?

Besides, no one had to reverse-engineer First4Internet's XCP software to determine it "phones home." One just had to look at DNS server caches. No one has to reverse engineer a piece of software to read the data it's sending if they use a transparent proxy or a packet sniffer.

As for the rest, I went into extreme detail here:

http://www.antiwindowscatalog.com/index.asp?mode=rant&id=39

Oh, and thanks for the excellent comedy material. I'll have to make sure I credit you in my next rant!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/409/33818#33818
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-08
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-08
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-14
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-16
Anonymous
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-07-20
From Canada
Windows genuine disadvantage 2006-08-28
Tony B
Windows Genuine Disadvantage 2006-10-05
Anonymous
Windows Genuine Disadvantage 2007-03-24
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus