Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
A Question of Ethics
Scott Granneman, 2006-09-15

Ethics are of incredible importance in the security field. Scott Granneman looks at recent examples of poor security decisions made at HP, Diebold, Sony, and Microsoft.

Comments Mode:
A question of ethics 2006-09-15
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: A question of ethics 2006-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: A question of ethics 2006-09-21
Anonymous
Re: A question of ethics 2006-09-19
Anonymous
A question of ethics 2006-09-15
Anonymous
A question of ethics 2006-09-17
Anonymous
A question of ethics 2006-09-19
Anonymous
Ethics = Stupidity and Poverty to Some 2006-09-19
A Life Observer and Fellow Traveler
'on a crutch 2006-09-29
Anonymous
A question of ethics 2006-09-29
*nix-usr
It is hubris. The groups mentioned (and implied) think that they are above the law, above ethics, that they are god-like and above it all. They pay lip-service to law, to ethics, and customer concerns (talk is cheap), but their actions say otherwise. All they really care about is what they want. Rather like narcissism.

The English historian Arnold Toynbee outlined the formula for classical Greek tragedy: koros (success or surfeit), hubris (sometimes translated as overweening pride), and ate (disaster and always a very ugly disaster). He also tried to demonstrate how he thought that formula worked in the history of civilizations. Interesting. --Jim

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/416/33931#33931
A Question of Ethics 2006-10-03
Thomas Elias Weatherly (1 replies)
Re: A Question of Ethics 2006-10-11
Anonymous-ish (1 replies)
Re: Re: A Question of Ethics 2006-10-22
Thomas Elias Weatherly







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus