, 2006-10-27
Scott Granneman takes a look at some big surprises in Microsoft's Vista EULA that limit what security professionals and others can do with the forthcoming operating system.
Expand all |
Post comment
Surpises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-30
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-30
murdamcloud (1 replies)
murdamcloud (1 replies)
Re: Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-11-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-12-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2007-04-11
Anonymous
Anonymous

Most people will get Vista with a new PC and never reinstall or move a license. Average users don't even know what virtualization is.
The really sad part is that MS is continuing to alienate the very IT workers and "geeks" who could be its biggest supporters. The number of people who would move a license more than once or use virtualization is tiny, so allowing it would cost the company almost nothing in lost sales.
But maybe MS is playing their cards right. Are you really going to set your parents up with a Linux box and provide support for them? Of course not, they already know how to use Windows and that's what they want. They don't care about restrictive EULAs that prevent them from doing something they wouldn't do anyway, they just want to send some emails.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/420/33950#33950