, 2006-10-27
Scott Granneman takes a look at some big surprises in Microsoft's Vista EULA that limit what security professionals and others can do with the forthcoming operating system.
Expand all |
Post comment
Surpises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Peter (9 replies)
Peter (9 replies)
Re: Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-30
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-11-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-12-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2007-04-11
Anonymous
Anonymous
I'm not the one who made the comment but the comment is true. Pick any flavor Linux and you should have no "virus" worries. I'm not saying that Linux is free from vulnerabilities but "virus" is not synonymous with "vulnerability" and it is not synonymous with "worm". The antivirus venders over the last several years have tried to broaden the term to mean more than it does. I have over 20 years of UNIX experience and have been working heavily with Linux from its birth and I have yet to see or hear of a "Linux" "virus" that actually makes it beyond the lab.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/420/33981#33981