, 2006-10-27
Scott Granneman takes a look at some big surprises in Microsoft's Vista EULA that limit what security professionals and others can do with the forthcoming operating system.
Expand all |
Post comment
Surpises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Peter (9 replies)
Peter (9 replies)
Re: Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-27
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-30
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Ant-UK (2 replies)
Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-30
murdamcloud (1 replies)
murdamcloud (1 replies)
Re: Surprises Inside Microsoft Vista's EULA
2006-10-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-11-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2006-12-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Is the limitation on reporting .Net Benchmarks a violation of free speech?
2007-04-11
Anonymous
Anonymous

Already today we have printers putting watermarks on printed pages to help trace who printed what. The ability to relate the writer of documents in MSWord to the PC that produced them and the link between that PC and the user it was registered to is indeed a scary thought.
In the US today where the ability of marketers to know ?everything? about you?and sell it to anyone who wants to pay is protected and treasured. So privacy is a fallacy. In a post Vista world they will have the ability to take it to a whole other level?.what have you been listening to and watching? and from a security services angle?what have you been writing.
No you say, that would not be available. It?s protected. Tell that to the reporters and HP staffers who had their personal phone calls passed around. If it?s captured, it?s available. All it takes is the right price. Or court injunction (under national security concerns of course).
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/420/33984#33984