Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy
Mark Rasch, 2006-10-31

Mark Rasch looks at two recent court cases where an employee's reasonable expectation of privacy was more important than the employer's ability to read any employee's e-mail - despite a privacy policy that clearly stated any company e-mail can, and will, be monitored.

Comments Mode:
Doesn't this suggest "Be a Bastard"? 2006-11-05
Nicholas Weaver (1 replies)
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
I'll buy that "no expectation of privacy" is not accurate, but can't you line most "company property" abuse policies to a broader policy that's in the company interest - for example, using email for personal use is more an issue of not wasting work time on personal affairs (e.g., not getting your work done) than it is a computer issue. I've always maintained that the "inappropriate web sites" clause in most internet use policies is enforcable from the sexual harassment policy alone, regardless of where you have an internet use policy or not. It's no different than not allowing employees to have skin magazines in their lockers.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/421/34048#34048
Inappropriate Use 2006-11-17
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Inappropriate Use 2006-12-18
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-05-25
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-06-24
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-06-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-10-23
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus