Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy
Mark Rasch, 2006-10-31

Mark Rasch looks at two recent court cases where an employee's reasonable expectation of privacy was more important than the employer's ability to read any employee's e-mail - despite a privacy policy that clearly stated any company e-mail can, and will, be monitored.

Comments Mode:
Doesn't this suggest "Be a Bastard"? 2006-11-05
Nicholas Weaver (1 replies)
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Inappropriate Use 2006-11-17
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Inappropriate Use 2006-12-18
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-17
Anand R
Any company that states it has a right to monitor systems should be carrying out the process in course of the business and not on an exceptions-only/reactive basis. If the company cannot demonstrate that it monitors and reviews usage as part of normal business, the jury may choose to absolve the employee of all charges.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/421/34055#34055
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-05-25
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-06-24
Anonymous
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-06-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-10-23
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus