Employee Privacy, Employer Policy

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy
Mark Rasch, 2006-10-31

Mark Rasch looks at two recent court cases where an employee's reasonable expectation of privacy was more important than the employer's ability to read any employee's e-mail - despite a privacy policy that clearly stated any company e-mail can, and will, be monitored.

Expand all | Post comment

Doesn't this suggest "Be a Bastard"? 2006-11-05
Nicholas Weaver (1 replies)

Re: Doesn't this suggest "Be a Bastard"? 2006-11-06
hf

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-12
Mike H

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-13
Anonymous (2 replies)

Re: Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-15
Anonymous (3 replies)

Re: Re: Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-17
Mark D. Rasch

Re: Re: Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2007-09-06
Anonymous

Inappropriate Use 2006-11-17
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)

Re: Inappropriate Use 2006-12-18
Anonymous

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2006-11-17
Anand R

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-01-24
mad mom

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-05-25
Anonymous

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2008-06-24
Anonymous

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-06-04
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-10-03
Anonymous

These courts have reasoned that such monitoring falls within either the "business extension" or "service provider" exception to the federal requirement that at least one party to an electronic communication, such as e-mail or Internet usage, must consent to the recording or monitoring.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/421/35537#35537

Employee Privacy, Employer Policy 2009-10-23
Anonymous