Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries
Mark Rasch, 2006-11-20

Mark Rasch looks at the license agreement for Windows Vista and how its product activation component, which can disable operation of the computer, may be like walking on thin ice.

Comments Mode:
Mac Leopard or Linux he he he 2006-11-21
Anonymous
Why none of this matters 2006-11-21
Jake (7 replies)
Re: Why none of this matters 2006-11-22
Anonymous
Re: Why none of this matters 2006-11-22
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Re: Why none of this matters 2006-11-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
fixed 2006-12-04
editor
Re: Why none of this matters 2006-11-22
Steve Bradley
Re: Wrong 2006-11-27
Anonymous
Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries 2006-11-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries 2006-11-22
Jeffrey Harris
Where was Rasch four years ago, and what degree in Law does he have? 2006-11-22
Gordon Fecyk (3 replies)
Re: Where was Rasch four years ago, and what degree in Law does he have? 2006-11-22
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
A few responses.. briefly. I didnt claim that Vista is spyware here (though it probably meets the legal definitions of spyware in many states.) I pointed out that spyware also has EULAs, so its not enough to say "well, you agreed to it in the EULA..." Look at FTC v. Odysseus Software on www.ftc.gov.

Second point. Sure, MS, and everyone else has a right to protected their product from infringement and theft. Absolutely. If you and I were to attempt to protect OUR legal rights, we would be forced to PROVE a violation of our rights through competent evidence, and with rare exceptions, would not be legally entitled to resort to "self-help." Imagine a car which, when a monthly payment is not made (or when the "owner" - the leasing company believes that one has not been paid) shuts itself off, leaving you stranded on the side of the highway until you call the company with a credit card number, and if they are wrong, you can go to court and get the amount of your overpayment back. Its not the RIGHT, its the REMEDY that may be unlawful - particularly under Maryland law.

Oh, I have a Juris doctor degree, and have been a practicing lawyer in 4 jurisdictions for over 24 years.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/423/34098#34098
Does Symantec practice 'self-help' in your 24-year legal opinion? 2006-11-22
Gordon Fecyk (2 replies)
off-topic 2006-11-24
moderator (1 replies)
Re: off-topic 2007-12-20
Anonymous
Your own product does this! 2006-11-22
Gordon Fecyk
Vista's EULA wrong direction 2006-11-22
withheld
Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries 2006-11-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries 2006-11-24
Bob from Denver (1 replies)
What No-one Else Has Noticed 2006-11-24
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: What No-one Else Has Noticed 2006-11-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: What No-one Else Has Noticed 2007-01-20
Anonymous
Just a taste of what's to come 2006-11-24
BaysideBas
if Vista is being used... 2006-11-25
Anonymous
Vista's EULA Product Activation Worries 2006-12-05
Anonymous (1 replies)







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus