, 2007-05-01
I wrote a column for Securityfocus some time ago that aired my concerns over GIAC dropping the practical portion of their certification process. That column resulted in a lot of feedback, with most agreeing about how GIAC bungled what was up till then, the best certification around.
Expand all |
Post comment
Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-02
Richard Bejtlich (1 replies)
Richard Bejtlich (1 replies)
Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-02
Don Parker (1 replies)
Don Parker (1 replies)
Re: Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-04
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Time for a new certification
2007-05-02
Rob Shein (1 replies)
Rob Shein (1 replies)
While I agree with many of your points regarding the practical exam I do not believe another cert is the answer. Look at jobs postings and I think you will see why GIAC watered down their requirements. There are way more postings for CISSP's (requires a test and no practical) than GIAC certified positions. Why would I go through all the hassel of a GIAC cert when I can get a CISSP and have a 10-1 ratio of job opportunities.
It is just like you stated, HR and employers do not know the difference between a gold & silver GIAC standard and I would wager many do not know the difference between a cissp and giac cert, if they have even heard of a GIAC cert.
"Time for a better Marketing Campaign" might be a better title for your story
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/443/34535#34535