, 2007-05-01
I wrote a column for Securityfocus some time ago that aired my concerns over GIAC dropping the practical portion of their certification process. That column resulted in a lot of feedback, with most agreeing about how GIAC bungled what was up till then, the best certification around.
Expand all |
Post comment
Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-02
Richard Bejtlich (1 replies)
Richard Bejtlich (1 replies)
Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-02
Don Parker (1 replies)
Don Parker (1 replies)
Re: Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Blocking port 53 TCP
2007-05-04
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Time for a new certification
2007-05-02
Rob Shein (1 replies)
Rob Shein (1 replies)
The CEPT from Infosec Institute recently added a practical portion to their Certified Expert Pen-Testing certification that requires you to find two vulnerabilities (one Windows & one Linux), write shellcode, and a workable exploit that will be tested. It also requires you to reverse engineer a Windows (based) binary. Of course this also includes a written portion prior to the lab.
The CPTE from Mile2 also have a practical portion to their Certified Pen-Testing Expert certification that requires you to conduct a full-pentest, written assessment, and countermeasures to present as a complete pen-testing assessment.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/443/34546#34546