Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Memo to Oracle: Nothing is 'Unbreakable'
Tim Mullen, 2001-12-10

Larry Ellison is setting himself up for a nasty fall by marketing Oracle as hack-proof

Comments Mode:
...and "anal retentive" has a hyphen when used as an adjective. 2001-12-11
Matthew X. Economou <xenophon@irtnog.org> (5 replies)
...and 2001-12-13
Anonymous
...and 2001-12-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
...and 2002-01-02
Earth Wolf
...and 2002-01-17
Anonymous
Read between the lines.... 2001-12-17
Focusin
...and 2001-12-18
Anonymous
...and 2001-12-18
Anonymous
I think the definition that applies is: incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result. The sequence of events being Oracle is touted as Unbreakable. The normal result being no one can break in to Oracle in contrast with the actual result of several exploits being found.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/45/9286#9286
Lets hear it again, FUD~FUD~FUD 2001-12-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Lets hear it again, FUD~FUD~FUD 2001-12-15
Rod Judy (2 replies)
FUD~I think so. 2001-12-17
Anonymous
The man has a point 2001-12-21
Anonymous
Lets hear it again, FUD~FUD~FUD 2001-12-15
Anonymous (3 replies)
FUD - Sounds fair and balanced. 2001-12-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
FUD - Sounds fair and balanced. 2002-01-18
That One Guy
This is FUD. 2001-12-20
Anonymous
This is FUD. 2001-12-20
Anonymous
OK where did he mention MS? 2001-12-21
Anonymous
Nothing is 'Unbreakable' HA!! 2001-12-21
Scarecrow
Memo to Tim: "Shut up." 2001-12-22
Anonymous
Memo to Oracle: Nothing is 'Unbreakable' 2001-12-26
criminal_terminal
get a life... where did XP get into this? 2001-12-30
dim blimb (1 replies)
Zealots 2002-01-01
LogicMan
Pride 2002-01-03
Andrew Hurley
Memo to Oracle: KEEP IT UP 2002-01-16
Anonymous
What Oracle mean by 'Unbreakable' 2002-01-17
Anonymous
Did most of you read the article? 2002-01-20
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus