, 2001-12-31
Everyone from the FBI to the L.A. Times has something scary to say about the new XP vulnerability. Here's why they all have it wrong.
Expand all |
Post comment
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (2 replies)
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (2 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Here you go Tim, the exploit is out !
2002-01-04
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)

No worm? So you claim to have read the advisory and now stand from your soapbox calling everyone else idiots? You chastise others to go read the Eeye advisory when it's painfully obvious that you read it and COMPLETELY failed to understand it's contents?
What part of "remote SYSTEM level exploit" and "all default XP installs vulnerable" did your pea-sized intellect fail to comprehend? It took roughly 5 months for some geek to write up Code Red to exploit the last Eeye discovered vulnerability of this calibre, yet you write an article definitively stating that we will see no new worm for this vulnerability?
Tim, I stand in awe of you. You stand now as a shining beacon - an example giving hope to morons and script-kiddies around the world that with luck, a bit of B.S., and absolutely no clue, they too can become respected security specialists and a columnist on Security Focus.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/50/9585#9585