, 2001-12-31
Everyone from the FBI to the L.A. Times has something scary to say about the new XP vulnerability. Here's why they all have it wrong.
Expand all |
Post comment
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds
2001-12-31
Anonymous (9 replies)
Anonymous (9 replies)
A lesson in comprehension...
2002-01-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
A lesson in... Comprehend this: MS has 36+Billion in Liquidity (4x next on list)
2002-01-06
gained by monopoly + inferior product = superior pricing (does this compute?) (1 replies)
gained by monopoly + inferior product = superior pricing (does this compute?) (1 replies)
A lesson in... Comprehend this: MS has 36+Billion in Liquidity (4x next on list)
2002-01-16
Anonymous
Anonymous
Here you go Tim, the exploit is out !
2002-01-04
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)

CIO of a company that makes security-oriented accounting
software that only runs on MS platforms. He's probably
looking at significant financial losses over MS's awful
security record.
I find the claim that there are no exploits for this bug to
be pretty amusing. MS has made it pretty clear that those
who do not keep their mouths shut about their bugs are "the
enemy", and those who don't want big trouble had better not
publish anything. If the hole was so big that it was
found within a day, if even MS said it was horrible, who is
Mr. Mullen, who has NOT seen the details, to deny that any
exploit exists?
Ah well, I'm a CISSP, my code requires me to tell the
truth...
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/50/9591#9591