, 2001-12-31
Everyone from the FBI to the L.A. Times has something scary to say about the new XP vulnerability. Here's why they all have it wrong.
Expand all |
Post comment
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (2 replies)
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (2 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
2001-12-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds
2001-12-31
Anonymous (9 replies)
Anonymous (9 replies)
A lesson in comprehension...
2002-01-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
A lesson in... Comprehend this: MS has 36+Billion in Liquidity (4x next on list)
2002-01-06
gained by monopoly + inferior product = superior pricing (does this compute?) (1 replies)
gained by monopoly + inferior product = superior pricing (does this compute?) (1 replies)
A lesson in... Comprehend this: MS has 36+Billion in Liquidity (4x next on list)
2002-01-16
Anonymous
Anonymous
Here you go Tim, the exploit is out !
2002-01-04
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)

It turns out that there's three security vulnerabilities associated with the UPnP: a buffer overflow vulnerability, a denial of service hazard, and a zombie-like remote attack hazard. Two of these vulnerabilities are avoidable if UPnP is turned off (contrary to what Mr. Mullen's article states).
As for the supposed FUD: Gee, people scream loudly when the sewer flows in the opposite direction. Who was it that classified open-source *nix's (except the one they borrowed IP stack code from) as viral?
My stance: there's not an OS out there that doesn't have problems. None is the end-all-to-be-all. Each does something better than the other. ALL of them require constant patching/updating. Get over it, fix the hole, move on to the next problem (there will always be another one).
Mr. Mullen: you need to do better research before posting such an article. With this one, you give the impression of a hidden motive (angry because someone had "gored your ox"?).
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/50/9596#9596