Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc.
Tim Mullen, 2001-12-31

Everyone from the FBI to the L.A. Times has something scary to say about the new XP vulnerability. Here's why they all have it wrong.

Comments Mode:
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-03
Patrik Birgersson (3 replies)
Autoupdate in XP 2002-01-04
jpostel
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-07
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-07
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
ALI ABOLFATHI
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (2 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
RE: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
Anonymous (2 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-05
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-02
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2001-12-31
Anonymous
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2001-12-31
Anonymous (9 replies)
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2001-12-31
Anonymous
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2001-12-31
Anonymous
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2002-01-01
Anonymous
A lesson in comprehension... 2002-01-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
A lesson in... Comprehend this: MS has 36+Billion in Liquidity (4x next on list) 2002-01-06
gained by monopoly + inferior product = superior pricing (does this compute?) (1 replies)
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2002-01-02
Anonymous
No worm? Tim, lay off the meds 2002-01-02
Anonymous
A great article, but ... 2002-01-13
Der HexXer (@gmx.net)
It it really is a critical vulnerability and not too many users are informed about security issues and apparently they aren't willing to spend some time on getting up-to-date.

And yes, media and authorities wrote some reports and/or advisories and/or really useful tools - written in pure assembly language, trying to save microsoft's xmas sales (maybe successfully did as these saved a bit of customer's trust in ms' products, yet there are a few millions vulnerable machines out there).
But these effords were at least not effective enough or just gave wrong instructions/information.
[Conspiracy theores ... i love them ... just another form of fudness.;)]

And i have to agree again with your opinon that too many people like to talk about some companies (some of them are leading the market by the way), instead of also focusing on other very important security holes [like:http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/246663;)].

It is a bad thing that vulnerabilities like this one exist in software installed on too many home machines, leaving the internet (but not limited only to the internet, of course) itself more than vulnerable.

Your article is very good (almost as enjoyable as eeye's advisory); i really like it ... but i have to oppose your opinion with this point:
"if you don't like ... [or it's politics; e.g. limited disclosure] then don't buy their products. Write your congressman. Get a job at Oracle. Wear a penguin T-shirt"
Yes ... or write malicious code, exploiting this vulnerability.
I think (it is more than possible) that someone will implement this vuln in a self-replicating, rapidly spreading code. Maybe it will take two additional months ... maybe three or four ... but face the fact:
There are millions of machines out there that could be directed (within a few hours) to perform attacks on the internet itself. I don't want to estimate what dramatic loss of image this could cause regarding the system's vendor or what damage such a code could cause among common economical structures ...
... "if the right people put their minds to it"!
[Just imagine ... what would happen if someone also implemented attack code on the telephony net (something like Job de Haas's research or just another dDoS perhaps).]

Again: A great article,
Der HexXer.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/50/9842#9842
In your bias opinion. 2002-01-01
Carnivore Knows
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-01
Mike Bunyard
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-01
Anonymous
Exploit out it appears 2002-01-02
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-02
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-02
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-02
Anonymous
Huh? 2002-01-03
guest@netpixies.net
Interesting article 2002-01-03
keydet89@yahoo.com
I know this is not the place, but 2002-01-03
Demostenes
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-03
Nighthawk
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-04
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-04
Anonymous (2 replies)
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-04
Anonymous
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-04
Anonymous
Reduced to perpetual apologist 2002-01-04
Paul Lembo
UPnP, an old vulnerability 2002-01-04
Alberto Cozer
Here you go Tim, the exploit is out ! 2002-01-04
Chad Cyrisse (1 replies)
Exploit for another vuln! 2002-01-15
Der HexXer (1 replies)
Exploit for another vuln! 2002-01-17
JHendo
Give me a break 2002-01-08
Burleyman (1 replies)
Give me a break 2002-01-08
aSteve (1 replies)
Give me a break 2002-01-09
Burleyman
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Inc. 2002-01-11
Anonymous
I love you 2002-01-16
bill.gates@microsoft.com
The bottom line... 2002-01-19
Carnivore knows (1 replies)
Re: The bottom line... 2006-02-24
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus