Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
A Security Wish List for 2002
Jon Lasser, 2002-01-09

An end to buffer overflows, and a beginning to serious user education ... These are a few of my favorite things.

Comments Mode:
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-09
Anonymous (5 replies)
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-09
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Languages can be fast _and_ safe 2002-01-10
Anonymous
Java Performance 2002-01-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Java Performance (and app performance in general) 2002-01-26
The Shadow Knows . . .
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Java vs Python 2002-01-20
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-24
Amarendra GODBOLE [amar AT efn DOT org]
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-14
player 2 (1 replies)
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-20
Levi (2 replies)
stupid idea... 2002-01-30
Anonymous
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-30
retro
Security Education 2002-01-10
Educator (5 replies)
Security Education 2002-01-11
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-14
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-19
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-19
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002: the stack 2002-01-10
scott@surfprivately.com
We all have same urge to amend reality 2002-01-10
by law or action or by dreaming our way around it...
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Night Hawk
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-12
Elc0chin0
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-24
Amarendra GODBOLE [amar AT efn DOT org ]
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-28
Anonymous
first we have to know whom responsability is..
is the company that made the programming language and didnt created a bound cheking within the product or the coder who make buggy code?
i think c clearly says it, its a free language where you can do many things and like asm lets you do lots of things and have the flexibility. i doesnt impose you things.
i think is clearly the programmers fault. we need better coders...
if companys spend more of their time in developing good software and not just worring abut $$ we would have good software and none of this would be happening.
the simplicity of unix is what makes it a beauty, security must be an attachment and not a built in.
security conciusness is the answer.
good policies, educations....


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/52/10201#10201







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus