Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
A Security Wish List for 2002
Jon Lasser, 2002-01-09

An end to buffer overflows, and a beginning to serious user education ... These are a few of my favorite things.

Comments Mode:
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-09
Anonymous (5 replies)
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-09
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Languages can be fast _and_ safe 2002-01-10
Anonymous
Java Performance 2002-01-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Java Performance (and app performance in general) 2002-01-26
The Shadow Knows . . .
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Java vs Python 2002-01-20
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-24
Amarendra GODBOLE [amar AT efn DOT org]
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-14
player 2 (1 replies)
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-20
Levi (2 replies)
stupid idea... 2002-01-30
Anonymous
learn asm? dumb idea. 2002-01-30
retro
Security Education 2002-01-10
Educator (5 replies)
Security Education - change behavior not ideas 2002-01-11
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-11
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-14
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-19
Anonymous
Security Education 2002-01-19
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002: the stack 2002-01-10
scott@surfprivately.com
We all have same urge to amend reality 2002-01-10
by law or action or by dreaming our way around it...
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-10
Night Hawk
Definitive Solution under Windows NT/2000/XP 2002-01-11
Marco
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-12
Elc0chin0
A Security Wish List for 2002 - blocking executables in mail 2002-01-16
Anonymous (2 replies)
A Security Wish List for 2002 - blocking executables in mail 2002-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
A Security Wish List for 2002 - blocking executables in mail 2002-01-19
Anonymous
Oh what, you're replacing the first two bytes of the DOS header in a Win32 PE? Doesn't that render the binary pretty well useless? i.e. not executable? Won't get much in the way of viruses from that huh?

.com files, on the other hand, don't have any initial structure (so far as I'm aware of anyway) and may fall victim to this technique.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/52/9989#9989
A Security Wish List for 2002 - blocking executables in mail 2002-05-02
Anonymous
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-24
Amarendra GODBOLE [amar AT efn DOT org ]
A Security Wish List for 2002 2002-01-28
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus