, 2002-01-21
Bill Gates can demonstrate that his new security push is genuine by choosing the right person to replace Howard Schmidt.
Expand all |
Post comment
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire
2002-01-21
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire
2002-01-22
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire- I second the Bruce Schneier nonimation.
2002-01-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Critical New Hire
2002-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-01-27
trowe (1 replies)
trowe (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-02-05
GCrumrine (1 replies)
GCrumrine (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-02-06
Scott (1 replies)
Scott (1 replies)

Perhaps "modulizing" more of the software code. Microsoft's security problems often relate to software that function DEPENDently. The plague of script viruses are a threat because of overly integrating components. Outlook is [IMO] the best product Microsoft develops, however it is also [IMO] the most dangerous because Outlook offers TOO much web browser functionality. Rendering a web page is a great feature of an email client; do it without the JAVA, VB, and/or ActiveX processing.
Another simple idea, follow the OpenBSD model of software release. That is default everything OFF. As an individual finds the need for X (i.e. IIS), let them enable the services. It is absolutely moronic Microsoft released W2K with SMTP as a default installed service that automatically starts. Secure or _not_, it is silly if not "resource intensive" to have SMTP on all the servers in an organization. OK that is my 2 cents.
As an aside Tim, this was a wonderfully objective critique of Microsoft future direction, perhaps your best articles yet. Stay objective!
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/54/10019#10019