Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Microsoft's Critical New Hire
Tim Mullen, 2002-01-21

Bill Gates can demonstrate that his new security push is genuine by choosing the right person to replace Howard Schmidt.

Comments Mode:
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Philip Storry (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Chad Cyrisse
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Russ Rogers
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-22
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-29
J. J. Horner (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-02-06
Anonymous
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Night Hawk
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
c.barbet
Simply following RFCs (and nix those proprietory extensions, i.e. Kerebos) in the software code would help for one. Microsoft could always try to pull expertise from the Linux community... ;-)

Perhaps "modulizing" more of the software code. Microsoft's security problems often relate to software that function DEPENDently. The plague of script viruses are a threat because of overly integrating components. Outlook is [IMO] the best product Microsoft develops, however it is also [IMO] the most dangerous because Outlook offers TOO much web browser functionality. Rendering a web page is a great feature of an email client; do it without the JAVA, VB, and/or ActiveX processing.

Another simple idea, follow the OpenBSD model of software release. That is default everything OFF. As an individual finds the need for X (i.e. IIS), let them enable the services. It is absolutely moronic Microsoft released W2K with SMTP as a default installed service that automatically starts. Secure or _not_, it is silly if not "resource intensive" to have SMTP on all the servers in an organization. OK that is my 2 cents.

As an aside Tim, this was a wonderfully objective critique of Microsoft future direction, perhaps your best articles yet. Stay objective!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/54/10019#10019
microsoft column's 2002-01-21
Ilja <ilja@coders.be> (2 replies)
microsoft column's 2002-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
microsoft column's 2002-01-23
michael
microsoft column's 2002-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Sucker Bet 2002-01-22
Anonymous
Should be beaten with Ugly Club 2002-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Should be beaten with Ugly Club 2002-01-26
Bob Bramwell
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-23
me@crymeariver.com (2 replies)
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-01-27
trowe (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-05
GCrumrine (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-06
Scott (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Who knows this quote? 2002-02-12
trowe
Pity that didn't work out. 2002-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-02-05
B.Forestal
Microsoft's Staff can cope with this change 2002-02-06
Mike Walsh, Helsinki







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus