, 2002-01-21
Bill Gates can demonstrate that his new security push is genuine by choosing the right person to replace Howard Schmidt.
Expand all |
Post comment
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire
2002-01-21
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire
2002-01-22
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire- I second the Bruce Schneier nonimation.
2002-01-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Critical New Hire
2002-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-01-27
trowe (1 replies)
trowe (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-02-05
GCrumrine (1 replies)
GCrumrine (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming
2002-02-06
Scott (1 replies)
Scott (1 replies)
Well anyway if they were, Mr. Mullen would certainly be among the best contestants.
About Mr. Mullen's comment on how people react to Bill Gates and Larry Ellison speeches on security, I will not agree with him... I have seen a lot of negative feedback to Oracle's "unbreakable" campaign.
I believe that Microsoft has really done some improvements on security... There is a lot more documentation on how to improve security of MS products than before, and the vulnerabilities are acknowledged when they arise.
And about Oracle's "unbreakable" campaign : based on the SecurityFocus database of vulnerabilities, if I wanted an "hard-to-break" database (unbreakable ? please ...), Id' pick Sybase over Oracle, by far...
Chad
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/54/10020#10020