Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Microsoft's Critical New Hire
Tim Mullen, 2002-01-21

Bill Gates can demonstrate that his new security push is genuine by choosing the right person to replace Howard Schmidt.

Comments Mode:
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Philip Storry (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Chad Cyrisse
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Russ Rogers
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
J Horner <jjhorner@bellsouth.net> (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-22
Joseph Finley (2 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-29
J. J. Horner (1 replies)
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-02-06
Anonymous
Bill Gates' Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
Night Hawk
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-21
c.barbet
microsoft column's 2002-01-21
Ilja <ilja@coders.be> (2 replies)
microsoft column's 2002-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
microsoft column's 2002-01-23
michael
microsoft column's 2002-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Sucker Bet 2002-01-22
Anonymous
Should be beaten with Ugly Club 2002-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Should be beaten with Ugly Club 2002-01-26
Bob Bramwell
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
"...a long awaited public asseveration that Microsoft has finally put security above all else."....!?

Nice job on finding "asseveration," but it doesn't help your argument much.

Ask anyone who has worked for Intelligence agencies and/or financial instituitions and they will tell you that **nothing** mission-critical runs on MS--whether web-based or not--unless there is no other way around it. I've seen people fired for trying to do it, in fact.

No one is asking for MS to put "security above all else." We are asking them to put it at a level somewhere above the effort to come up with a new gorgeous shade of blue for the IE icon. I should think that we would all be quite surprised if they accept any responsibility for their faults--that they acknowledge that security vulnerabilities are almost always due to shoddy code.

I am hopeful. But when faced with the choice of admitting they were wrong and proving they were not, MS--as with petty people--usually begin immediately on the proof. And, though we should never say never, one should think Schneier would rather stoke the fires of hell than be a lackey for MS.



[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/54/10039#10039
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-23
me@crymeariver.com (2 replies)
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-01-27
trowe (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-05
GCrumrine (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-06
Scott (1 replies)
Alarming News! Truely Alarming 2002-02-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Who knows this quote? 2002-02-12
trowe
Pity that didn't work out. 2002-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Critical New Hire 2002-02-05
B.Forestal
Microsoft's Staff can cope with this change 2002-02-06
Mike Walsh, Helsinki







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus