Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Expand all | Post comment

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)

"Why is personal secrecy such a talisman, but corporate secrecy an anathema to privacy advocates?"

Because freedom can only be maintained while we have the ability to monitor the actions of those with power over us. It's the only way the democratic system can function to check the power of government and corporations (which, increasingly, are the same thing these days.)

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10564#10564

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-05
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-25
Ferret

Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-06
Chris L

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-07
Steve