Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Expand all | Post comment

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-05
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)

The underlying information is not protected. It is merely the act of disclosing it that is protected. Moreover, if the information is disclosed for improper purposes (e.g., to defraud) it is not protected, nor is it protected if obtained by the government by other means.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10606#10606

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-25
Ferret

Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-06
Chris L

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-07
Steve