Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Comments Mode:
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-25
Ferret
Uh - Mark - I think you have left out a word in there! It is not "merely the act of disclosing it that is protected." If it is exempted from the Freedom Of Information Act, then it is quite obviously the 'act' of NOT disclosing it that is protected.

Isn't it amazing what a difference one word can make?

Ferret out misdirection wherever it occurs.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10635#10635
Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus