Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Expand all | Post comment

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-05
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-25
Ferret

Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)

Mark has made a parallel between attorney-client and doctor-patient privilege , but I think those priveleges are there to protect personal privacy - I don't think that compares to a corporation that wants to hide its 'dirty laundry' at the expense of the security of our national infrastructure.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10637#10637

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-06
Chris L

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-07
Steve