Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Comments Mode:
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-06
Chris L
"Why is personal secrecy such a talisman, but corporate secrecy an anathema to privacy advocates?"

First of all, large corporations make millions of dollars collecting, trading, and selling the American People's, credit, banking, andother personal information.
While large corporations have been running over the personal privacy right's of the American People for years, now they think they require special privledge in having their information held in confidence.
Sharing this information and making it available to the public and other regulatory bodies for review should be a requirement of participating in businesses that involve our Nation's Critical Infrastructure, period. It's a free country, nobody is forcing them to participate, they can sell their business(es) to someone that wants to play by the rules.
Another example of why we so desperately need Campaign Finance Reform in this country. We love to regulate and control indvidual behaviour, and enforce it with more prisons and police. Spending taxpayer money regulating Big Business, is considered Big Government. The Bush administration wants Government out of the business of regulating Big Business, but doesn't mind regulating a woman's reproductive system.

I wish us luck!


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10832#10832
Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus