Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough
Mark Rasch, 2002-02-18

An exemption from the Freedom of Information Act isn't enough. Companies needs a new legal privilege as an incentive for sharing cyber security details

Expand all | Post comment

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-18
Anonymous (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-05
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-19
Chris (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Mark Rasch (1 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-25
Ferret

Ur going the wrong way 2002-02-19
Amused

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-22
Anonymous

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-06
Chris L

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-10
Mark Rasch replies

Secrecy Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough 2002-03-07
Steve

Personal privacy is not equivalent to corporate secrecy. Personal privacy is essential to a democracy, corporate or government secrecy is anathema to it.

If the corporations are so concerned about industry security, they'll band together and work it out themselves. If not, they won't. And as someone has noted before, if our "national infrastructure" is so vulnerable to "cyber-attack," we need to start firing people and unplugging NICs. Was it not the FAA's recent testimony that no air traffic control systems were dependent upon or connected to the internet? So much for Richard Clarke's hysteria...

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/61/10865#10865