, 2002-03-28
The Good Samaritan defence, invoked by hackers like Adrian Lamo, can too easily be distorted by those with less altruistic intentions.
Expand all |
Post comment
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-03-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-03-28
Anonymous (8 replies)
Anonymous (8 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-03-29
Rick Forno (1 replies)
Rick Forno (1 replies)
so next time i mistype an url...
2002-03-29
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-03-29
In Response to the Anonymous Above
In Response to the Anonymous Above
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-03-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-01
Steve (2 replies)
Steve (2 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-01
William W. Bishop
William W. Bishop
The question is simple, but the answer may be complicated, and becoming more so.
2002-04-01
Anonymous
Anonymous
The first four letters of analogy. . . .
2002-04-01
Ira Wing (2 replies)
Ira Wing (2 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-03
Andy Schmitt (kphrakNO@worldofschmittSPAM.ALLOWEDcom) (1 replies)
Andy Schmitt (kphrakNO@worldofschmittSPAM.ALLOWEDcom) (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
2002-04-14
gil@ateliermobile.de
gil@ateliermobile.de

The person walks by the bank, notices that the door is locked, but the lock is cheap and easy to defeat. The person takes out his trusty set of breaking and entering tools and gains entrance to the bank. When inside, he notices that the vault is also easy to crack, and proceeds to gain entrance to it. He stands in the vault...notices, but does not take any money...and then leaves. Later on, he calls the bank and reports that he was able to get beyond their security.
Its called breaking and entering, and tresspassing. It is a crime whether something was stolen or not.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/70/11572#11572