Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers
Richard Forno, 2002-03-28

The Good Samaritan defence, invoked by hackers like Adrian Lamo, can too easily be distorted by those with less altruistic intentions.

Comments Mode:
Good Samaritan Guidelines 2002-03-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Good Samaritan Guidelines 2002-04-09
ImNotAHacker@hotmail.com
The first four letters of analogy. . . . 2002-04-01
Ira Wing (2 replies)
The first four letters of analogy. . . . 2002-04-04
Andy Richmond (1 replies)
We're both right. 2002-04-13
Ira Wing
Case Against 2002-04-02
Spade
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers 2002-04-03
Andy Schmitt (kphrakNO@worldofschmittSPAM.ALLOWEDcom) (1 replies)
"...Good Samaritan Hackers" Bad English. 2002-04-05
Andy Richmond (1 replies)
right.. 2002-04-09
Anonymous
Which law? 2002-04-04
80N
Beware the Kindness of Strangers: The Case Against Good Samaritan Hackers 2002-04-04
Anonymous
I think the "intentions" behind a hacker is irrelevant. Breaking into another person's home or computer is a violation of that person's rights no matter WHAT their intentions are.
If a hacker wants to be able to use their skills for security enhancement then they should either get a job w/a company that *professionally* breaks into computers or start their own business doing so. The difference is that the target has given *permission* for the hacker(s) to do so. Without permission you are violating their rights (property) and are therefore a criminal.

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions..." --author unknown (to me)

NightSwitch

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/70/11672#11672
What about the "lurkers"? 2002-04-12
Bob Radvanovsky
Digital Vigilantism? 2002-04-12
Bob Radvanovsky







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus