Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole
Mark Rasch, 2002-04-22

Those cheap wireless video cameras hawked by annoying pop-up ads can be intercepted by anyone with a few hundred dollars and a voyeristic bent. There's no federal law against it, but there should be.

Comments Mode:
Here we go again -- trying to plug a security hole with legislation instead of technology 2002-04-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
This is *exactly* the sort of knee-jerk response that leads to things like mandatory key-escrow systems.

Title III was and is a ridiculous government intrusion into all of our rights for the benefit of a few companies. Basically, they didn't want to have to go to the expense of adding voice scrambling to their cell phones, so instead they got the government to limit where the rest of us could listen on the public airwaves, and what kind of receiving equipment we could buy. Now you're pushing for the same kind of thing with video cameras. Why should the rest of us be burdened just so a few companies can make a device that's $5 cheaper?


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/76/12028#12028
It's a sad day 2002-04-22
Xenophon Fenderson, the Carbon(d)ated
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-04
Mark D. Rasch
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-08
Richard S. Keirstead
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-09
Kevin White







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus