Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole
Mark Rasch, 2002-04-22

Those cheap wireless video cameras hawked by annoying pop-up ads can be intercepted by anyone with a few hundred dollars and a voyeristic bent. There's no federal law against it, but there should be.

Comments Mode:
Here we go again -- trying to plug a security hole with legislation instead of technology 2002-04-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Here we go again -- trying to plug a security hole with legislation instead of technology 2002-04-23
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
Here we go again -- trying to plug a security hole with legislation instead of technology 2002-04-24
Anonymous
Not if you used encryption. Which you should be doing *anyway*, because a law will only keep the honest people out. It would probably have loopholes for law enforcement anyway, so your police argument doesn't carry weight. I believe it is, for example, still legal for the police to eavesdrop on your cell phone, it just isn't legal for anyone else.

Look at it this way: This law would be like requiring me to brick over my windows because my neighbor doesn't want to buy drapes.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/76/12080#12080
It's a sad day 2002-04-22
Xenophon Fenderson, the Carbon(d)ated
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-04-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-04
Mark D. Rasch
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-08
Richard S. Keirstead
Closing the Spycam Sniffer Loophole 2002-05-09
Kevin White







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus