, 2002-05-15
Unix and Linux security owes much to openness and public disclosure, but Microsoft is too far gone for sunshine to do any good.
Expand all |
Post comment
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-20
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-16
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-17
blane (1 replies)
blane (1 replies)

What about the Sun OS that resets configurations to defaults when patches are applied...something I fight with the Unix folks where I work all the time.
In Open Source, while there is peer review, no company or organization can certify code unless they have their own cadre of programmers. Even if the code is proven faulty, what recourse do we have? Sue some 17-year old in California? The solution is then ONLY get code from a reputable vendor...then you commit yourself into paying for special services, which you are trying to avoid in the first place with Open Source and freely available software. At least with the commercial software angle, when there is bad code, there is someone to go after
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/82/12582#12582