Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
Jon Lasser, 2002-05-15

Unix and Linux security owes much to openness and public disclosure, but Microsoft is too far gone for sunshine to do any good.

Comments Mode:
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up 2002-05-16
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up 2002-05-16
Anonymous (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up 2002-05-20
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please 2002-05-16
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please 2002-05-17
blane (1 replies)
RE: Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please 2002-05-17
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious 2002-05-16
Anonymous (7 replies)
Another Victim Overlooks the Obvious 2002-05-16
Anon (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious 2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious 2002-05-17
Anonymous Unix Gal (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious - Rebuttal 2002-05-17
Anonymous (5 replies)
Come back to earth SpaceMonkey - I rebutt your rebutt 2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
1) No, there is no 'BulletProof' OS, but proper programming methodologies do exist and I seriously doubt that you could make the argument that Microsoft has ever heard of them. Properly secured APIs and restricted system access are the hallmarks of a properly designed OS - not spaghetti code and unnecessary applications (IE, Media Player, etc...) that have been 'innovated' into the root of the OS. The only thing protecting us, as argued in the article, is the obscurity of MS' APIs. My money is on Linux being the more secure OS 100% of the time - not because they are Open Source, but because they have implemented a security framework in their design and actually stick to it.

2) If you want to rant and rave at MS you will have to pay for it - the level of the person you get to yell at is purely defined by the size of your wallet and even if you pay enough to get an audience with Bill Gates you will still get the same response... 'your business is important to us, we appreciate your

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/82/12625#12625
Not "a teenager in Croatia". 2002-05-20
Anonymous
Let's Be Real 2002-05-21
Anonymous
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please 2002-05-21
blacklight (1 replies)
Another attempt at trying to get fired 2002-05-24
Someone fire this guy :\







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus