, 2002-05-15
Unix and Linux security owes much to openness and public disclosure, but Microsoft is too far gone for sunshine to do any good.
Expand all |
Post comment
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-20
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-16
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-17
blane (1 replies)
blane (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-16
Anonymous (7 replies)
Anonymous (7 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-17
Anonymous Unix Gal (1 replies)
Anonymous Unix Gal (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious - Rebuttal
2002-05-17
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
Come back to earth SpaceMonkey - I rebutt your rebutt
2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

> of NT/W2K's insecurity at the OS level?
Haven't seen an update from Gene, but probably around somewhere.
http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/coast/ms_penetration_testing/
I agree applications are more important.
Face it Linux is only about 18MB of download most of which is docs
and the like.
The core GNU apps probably only about 40MB,
which is collectively smaller than my web browser.
For me key server apps are DNS and HTTP and SMTP servers.
In MS case all of these applications are unusuable where security is
required, but it doesn't stop people doing it.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/82/12749#12749