, 2002-05-15
Unix and Linux security owes much to openness and public disclosure, but Microsoft is too far gone for sunshine to do any good.
Expand all |
Post comment
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
Matthew Kauffman (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-16
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
...Until Microsoft redesigns from the ground up
2002-05-20
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
manually adding html tags to be safe (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-16
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Not Really Anonymous (1 replies)
Memo to Microsoft: Stay Secretive, Please
2002-05-17
blane (1 replies)
blane (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-16
Anonymous (7 replies)
Anonymous (7 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious
2002-05-17
Anonymous Unix Gal (1 replies)
Anonymous Unix Gal (1 replies)
Another Linux/Unix Apologist Overlooks the Obvious - Rebuttal
2002-05-17
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
Come back to earth SpaceMonkey - I rebutt your rebutt
2002-05-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

See Security Enhanced Linux.
I just don't think most people are that interested in having
secure systems.
The common problems are still buffer overflows and other memory
overwriting problems. Most of these problems can easily
be solved by writing in languages that prevent these problems,
but that requires junking a lot of code and starting from scratch, and
that takes time and money.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/82/12750#12750