Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril
Tim Mullen, 2002-07-08

Whether Microsoft's ambitious project is a security solution or a Trojan horse depends much on the company's intentions.

Comments Mode:
....only the best of intentions ... 2002-07-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Arms race did exist 2002-07-08
Anonymous
The Peril of the Hardware... 2002-07-08
Nicholas Weaver
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril - but why? 2002-07-09
TL
Microsoft decided to jump in the content-industry bandwagon for "every hardware device must be protected" because it's good for their business. Sure, we can find all kinds of conspiracy theories and secret cabals out to protect the allmighty buck, but it's still a legimate use for encryption. Or is encryption only good when it's used by brave open source individualists against bad and corrupt corporate suits?

If you don't like devices that disallow use of competing products then don't buy them. If Word documents can't be opened in Staroffice then don't save them in Word format. It's the same thing as with CDs/DVDs crippled by copyright control schemes - if people refuse to buy these inferior products, they will go away.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/93/13643#13643
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-09
L0k1 (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-11
Anonymous
What about the others? 2002-07-09
MERLiiN
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
SaltyNetGuru
Wrong problem indeed,... 2002-07-10
Anonymous
Yea, best interest 2002-07-18
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus