Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril
Tim Mullen, 2002-07-08

Whether Microsoft's ambitious project is a security solution or a Trojan horse depends much on the company's intentions.

Comments Mode:
....only the best of intentions ... 2002-07-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Arms race did exist 2002-07-08
Anonymous
The Peril of the Hardware... 2002-07-08
Nicholas Weaver
Hardware *is* absolutely necessary for any real security 2002-07-09
Dominique Brezinski (1 replies)
Hardware *is* absolutely necessary for any real security 2002-07-09
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril - but why? 2002-07-09
TL
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-09
L0k1 (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-11
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
Anonymous
What about the others? 2002-07-09
MERLiiN
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
Halvar
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
SaltyNetGuru
Wrong problem indeed,... 2002-07-10
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-10
Anonymous
Trusting MS with the ability of my computer to properly run software that wasn't written by MS or their corporate development partners seems to be asking a bit much. With their public stance on open source, does anyone actually believe that they will make it possible (or easy) to use any software that isn't built using their proprietary tools and conforming to a closed, commercial license model.

Anyone who trusts Redmond with that choice should contact me about this bridge I've got for sale. You can put up your own toll booth....you'll be amazed at the results!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/93/13768#13768
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-10
Hamster1
Yea, best interest 2002-07-18
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus