Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril
Tim Mullen, 2002-07-08

Whether Microsoft's ambitious project is a security solution or a Trojan horse depends much on the company's intentions.

Comments Mode:
....only the best of intentions ... 2002-07-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Arms race did exist 2002-07-08
Anonymous
The Peril of the Hardware... 2002-07-08
Nicholas Weaver
Hardware *is* absolutely necessary for any real security 2002-07-09
Dominique Brezinski (1 replies)
Hardware *is* absolutely necessary for any real security 2002-07-09
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril - but why? 2002-07-09
TL
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-09
L0k1 (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
The wrong problem addressed 2002-07-11
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
Anonymous
What about the others? 2002-07-09
MERLiiN
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
Halvar
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-09
SaltyNetGuru
Wrong problem indeed,... 2002-07-10
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-10
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-10
Hamster1
Yea, best interest 2002-07-18
Anonymous
Palladium holds Promise, and Peril 2002-07-21
Anonymous
If Palladium makes it into general PC hardware you won't be
able to control who has it.

Do people really want terrorists to be able to communicate more securely?




[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/93/15754#15754




 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus