Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea
Jon Lasser, 2002-07-17

Why Microsoft's Palladium project threatens to send Linux and open-source into exile.

Comments Mode:
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-18
Anonymous (6 replies)
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-18
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-23
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-22
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-18
Anonymous
Unbelieveable 2002-07-18
Anonymous (5 replies)
Unbelieveable 2002-07-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Unbelieveable 2002-07-20
Anonymous
Unbelieveable 2002-07-21
Anonymous
Unbelieveable 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Unbelieveable 2002-07-19
Martin Schoch
Unbelieveable 2002-07-20
Anonymous
Unbelieveable 2002-07-20
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-18
blacklight (1 replies)
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-23
Anonymous
Take a chill pill 2002-07-18
Anonymous Bastard (3 replies)
take your own advice 2002-07-19
rsullivan@art-line.com (1 replies)
Re: take your own advice 2002-07-19
Anonymous Bastard (2 replies)
Re: take your own advice 2002-07-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
happy x86 processor world? riiiiight... 2002-07-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: take your own advice 2002-07-21
Anonymous
Re: take your own advice 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Re: Take a chill pill 2002-07-19
Jm4n
Take a chill pill 2002-07-21
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
OSS version of Palladium 2002-07-20
Abri
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
SkyLeach
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-19
Anonymous (6 replies)
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-20
bufferoverwhelmed
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-20
Anonymous
Palladium and buffer overflows 2002-07-21
Anonymous
Pride goeth before a Fall 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Couldn't _anyone_ make a "signature stamp"? 2002-07-19
Mad Ivan
Question - couldn't `trusted´ OSS individuals or organizations create their own keys and sign software? For example, if RedHat signed their kernels and binary distributions, or the Debian organization's key members published keys they created, open-source groups could trust them. For individual end users, it would boil down to "I personally believe (by having met them, or other experience) that 'Joe Blow' writes trustworthy software".

Of course, this doesn't solve the problem of a near-monopolistic group of content providers issuing DRM-locked music/video/.... which would only `trust´ keys generated by Microsoft. Perhaps a rational examination of the market they would be excluding by not trusting keys issued by large, reliable OSS providers could convince them otherwise.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/96/15729#15729
No evidence for these claims 2002-07-19
Tamperbell (2 replies)
No evidence for these claims 2002-07-22
Anonymous
No evidence for these claims 2002-07-23
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-19
Anonymous
Alternate hardware 2002-07-20
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-20
Anonymous
THE DEVIL AND THE DEEP BLUE SEE 2002-07-20
NSS ( Network Ssecurity Systems)
It's all about trust 2002-07-20
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-21
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-22
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-23
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-22
Anonymous
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea 2002-07-23
Anonymous
Copyright and Anti-piracy laws 2002-07-29
Anonymous
It is time for "security enhanced linux" to be put on the front burner NOW! 2002-07-29
100% of distros should be 100% SE Linux







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus