Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Beta Programs
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
Anti-spam technology resurrected as FrogNet
Robert Lemos,
2006-05-25
Comments
Mode:
Threaded
Flat
Expand all
|
Post comment
Anti-spam technology resurrected as FrogNet
2006-05-25
xz0dius
Anti-spam technology resurrected as FrogNet
2006-05-26
ADG
(1 replies)
Re: Anti-spam technology resurrected as FrogNet
2006-05-28
Anonymous
Don't bet on it holding up...
2006-05-27
Nicholas Weaver
(2 replies)
Re: Don't bet on it holding up...
2006-05-29
Anonymous
Re: Don't bet on it holding up...
2006-05-30
Anonymous
RTFM Nicholas
A: it is not useful for DOS purposes - bandwidth limited
B: The spammers already have the bits of the list they get sent
C: Better for this purpose than a centralised service
good potential for what they are trying to do
[ reply ]
Link to this comment:
http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/216/1020#1020
Anti-spam technology resurrected as FrogNet
2006-05-30
RTFM4TW
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus
A: it is not useful for DOS purposes - bandwidth limited
B: The spammers already have the bits of the list they get sent
C: Better for this purpose than a centralised service
good potential for what they are trying to do
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/216/1020#1020