Funny... some time ago there were info about security issues in Firefox.
The subject of the article was something like "5 security flaws fixed in Firefox". In the article, there was information that there was 5 critical issues, and a lot of moderate and low status issues...
The article: http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/221
Someone wrote then this:
Incorrect. There are 5 fixes rated critical, 3 rated High (not 2), 3 rated moderate, and 1 rated Low. If this were an article on IE, I am sure the headline would have read "MS Fixes 12 security flaws in IE".
And, as you can see, he/she was right.
Now we have security flaws in Microsofts products, there are 7 critical issued fixed, but the subject contains all security flaws..
I would suggest more objectivity in the articles...
The subject of the article was something like "5 security flaws fixed in Firefox". In the article, there was information that there was 5 critical issues, and a lot of moderate and low status issues...
The article: http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/221
Someone wrote then this:
Incorrect. There are 5 fixes rated critical, 3 rated High (not 2), 3 rated moderate, and 1 rated Low. If this were an article on IE, I am sure the headline would have read "MS Fixes 12 security flaws in IE".
And, as you can see, he/she was right.
Now we have security flaws in Microsofts products, there are 7 critical issued fixed, but the subject contains all security flaws..
I would suggest more objectivity in the articles...
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/228/1082#1082