Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Vista
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
U.S. gov't mandates laptop security
Kelly Martin,
2006-06-28
Comments
Mode:
Threaded
Flat
Expand all
|
Post comment
Full Disc Encryption products
2006-07-06
Saqib Ali
And there are some agencies doing just
that in DC. The following are some reasons why full disc encryption is
preferable.
1) Encryption of temporary / swap is important as confidential data
maybe revealed from these files in case of HDD theft.
2) Quick Erase functionality as advertised by Seagate's FDE.2 drive
provide immediate data destruction by replacing the AES key on the
ASIC. This can save thousands of dollar the agency spends in proper
destruction of the HDD. See
http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/marketing/po_momentus_5400_fde_bb.pdf
3) user-proof. everything is encrypted if FDE is enabled.
4) pre-boot authentication.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment:
http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/239/1180#1180
U.S. gov't mandates laptop security
2006-07-06
Anonymous
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus
that in DC. The following are some reasons why full disc encryption is
preferable.
1) Encryption of temporary / swap is important as confidential data
maybe revealed from these files in case of HDD theft.
2) Quick Erase functionality as advertised by Seagate's FDE.2 drive
provide immediate data destruction by replacing the AES key on the
ASIC. This can save thousands of dollar the agency spends in proper
destruction of the HDD. See
http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/marketing/po_momentus_5400_fde_bb.pdf
3) user-proof. everything is encrypted if FDE is enabled.
4) pre-boot authentication.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/239/1180#1180