Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Beta Programs
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
Laptop containing VA data recovered
Robert Lemos,
2006-06-29
Comments
Mode:
Threaded
Flat
Expand all
|
Post comment
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-29
Anonymous
(1 replies)
Re: Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-07-03
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Fuion
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Remain Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
eyec
(2 replies)
Re: Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-06-30
Anonymous
"FBI forensics tech"
More than likly it was farmed out to a consultant agency. As the gentlemen stated before, if the 'thieves' knew what they were doing they just pulled a perfect crime. They have the jewels when the police (at least publically) believe they dont.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment:
http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/241/1164#1164
Re: Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-08-28
Anonymous
i don't buy it.
2006-06-30
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered: Cloned or Not!
2006-07-01
The Instructor
Malarky
2006-07-03
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-07-05
Anonymous
Laptop containing VA data recovered
2006-07-18
Anonymous
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus
More than likly it was farmed out to a consultant agency. As the gentlemen stated before, if the 'thieves' knew what they were doing they just pulled a perfect crime. They have the jewels when the police (at least publically) believe they dont.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/241/1164#1164