I'm a part time IT conultant myself, I majored in computer networking, and I'm studying several certifications related to IT. For the many years I've dealt with PC's micosoft has always been known for poor security in the OS,buggy software, etc. While this is true and we all know Microsoft's has had trouble because of it's control of the market....why is it now that they come up with something that sounds good in theory (of course this is MS and they'll be bugs lol) to protect the core of the OS why do we see everyone bitching. It's good to have companies like Symantec and Mcafee but when it comes to ensuring that the OS and in the end ultimately the

clients privacy, business infastructure, identity, etc is secure then all else be damned..including Mcafee and Symantec.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/322/1418#1418