2009-01-16
Expand all |
Post comment
This is hogwash...
2009-01-19
Anonymouse (4 replies)
Anonymouse (4 replies)
1) It is not an electron microscope 2) It is definitely possible to see bits
2009-01-19
Colby Boles (1 replies)
Colby Boles (1 replies)
Re: 1) It is not an electron microscope 2) It is definitely possible to see bits
2009-01-21
Demagnetized Magnetician
Demagnetized Magnetician

Used drives or not - worst-case was a pristine drive, which is a valid test. Still, look at the numbers: about 1% of 32-bits is recoverable. In other words, 32-bits is about 1 complete four-letter word in a text document, and you get one complete word in a 100-word document. Hardly useful.
Sure, you get 32% of the charaters "correctly" in a document, for example... but the problem is you don't know which ones are correct, and which ones aren't. Sure, some words can be figured out, but 32% of the text makes for a useless document... you could probably make it say "anything".
Don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting the paper's conclusions... this is simply intended as a reply to a comment-reply. I, too, am awaiting "the truth" of this study.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/newsbriefs/888/2775#2775