, SecurityFocus 2007-06-15
Jeremiah Grossman has long stopped looking for vulnerabilities in specific Web sites, and even if he suspects a site to have a critical flaw that could be compromised by an attacker, he's decided to keep quiet.
The silence weighs heavily on the Web security researcher. While ideally he would like to find flaws, and help companies eliminate them, the act of discovering a vulnerability in any site on the Internet almost always entails gaining unauthorized access to someone else's server -- a crime that prosecutors have been all too willing to pursue.
"I have long since curtailed my research," said Grossman, who serves as the chief technology officer for Web site security firm WhiteHat Security. "Any Web security researcher that has been around long enough will notice vulnerabilities without doing anything. When that happens, I don't tell anyone, rather than risk reputational damage to myself and my company."
Grossman's fears underscore the fact that security researchers who find flaws in Web sites are crossing a line and trespassing on systems that do not belong to them. However, applying the law to good Samaritans interested in eliminating possible online risks only undermines the security of the Internet, a working group of researchers, digital-rights advocates and federal law enforcement officials concluded this week.
"I think that if you look at the software security world, there has been many, many cases of someone knowing about a vulnerability before you do and be using it out in the wild," said Sara Peters, editor for the Computer Security Institute. "There is no way to say that these same things are not happening in the Web world. Assuming that nothing is going wrong, because you haven't heard about it is a very myopic and callow way of looking at it."
Dubbed the Working Group on Web Security Research Law, the panel of experts has started to study whether researchers have any ability to play the good Samaritan and find security flaws in Web sites without risking prosecution. The group met at the Computer Security Institute's NetSec on Monday and released an initial report that raises more questions about the status of Web vulnerability research than provides answers to concerned bug hunters.
While security researchers have been able to test computer software and disclose details about any flaws found, the working group concluded that there is no way to test a Web server without prior authorization and not run the risk of being prosecuted. Software security researchers are free to disclose flaws fully or take part in a process that allows the vendor to plug the holes, while Web researchers that disclose vulnerabilities in a way that angers the Web site owner could easily be reported to law enforcement.
"The way it is right now, if you find a vulnerability and the site owner finds about it, you can be held culpable for anything that happens after that," Peters said. "Perhaps, that is a bit of hyperbole, but not much. There is no culpability for the Web site owner."